Downey v. Instaloans Financial Options Centres McLennan Ross acted when it comes to Defendants in this course action commenced in Ontario against a payday financial institution, that has been settled within the general settlement for the Ontario and Alberta course procedures against our consumers. The settlement agreements had been authorized because of the Courts in Ontario and Alberta.
Fong et al v. Grenville-Germain Calgary Limited Partnership McLennan Ross acted when it comes to directors of the company which constructed an extra condominium/hotel/office complex in a action commenced with respect to the owners of the domestic condominiums for misrepresentations and inadequacies.
Hudyma v. LoyaltyOne, Inc. et al McLennan Ross acted for an worldwide transport provider with regards to an action involving a sizable travel facilitator while the incorporation of gas surcharges into the calculation of expenses.
Kilroy v. a okay payday loans inc. et al it was A uk Columbia course action against lots of cash advance operations, by which McLennan Ross represented three of this Defendants. The Plaintiff discontinued its action against our customers.
Korte v. Cormie McLennan Ross had been counsel into the auditors in this course of action, a вЂњrepresentative proceedingвЂќ ahead of the utilization of course procedures legislation in Alberta, that has been brought with respect to every one of the investors in 2 subsidiaries associated with Principal Group, an economic conglomerate that failed. The problem had been settled just before exams for finding.
Lahaie v. Goodyear this is a course action against Goodyear
McLennan Ross assisted as Alberta counsel in commencing the course action in Alberta during the request of British Columbia counsel, who’d currently commenced an action in British Columbia. The problem had been settled in British Columbia.
MacKinnon v. National cash Mart et al This course action had been brought in British Columbia resistant to the major operators into the loan industry that is payday. McLennan Ross ended up being counsel to at least one associated with Defendants. We had been effective in opposing a software for official official official certification, following that the Plaintiff discontinued this course of action as against our consumers.
Nette v. Stiles et al In this class that is proposed, the Plaintiff advertised from the Alberta national plus the College of Chiropractors that particular therapy ended up being harmful and really should never be allowed within the Province of Alberta. McLennan Ross represented a Defendant and brought a software to truly have the claim dismissed just before certification. The Plaintiff discontinued against our customer prior to the application had been argued.
O’Keefe v. Menu Foods working Limited Partnership McLennan Ross had been taking part in a course action brought by owners alleging this 1 associated with the major suppliers of pet meals in Alberta failed to have quality settings set up which led to the loss of home animals from tainted meals. This litigation had been remedied by settlement between the events.
Pauli et al v. Ace INA Insurance et al McLennan Ross acted as Alberta counsel for example of this Defendants in this course of action which desired an interpretation associated with Insurance Act and a return of every deductible charged where there was clearly a loss that is total of under consideration. The action had been remedied in preference of the Defendants after an overview dedication of a true point of legislation.
Ramias v. Johnson McLennan Ross ended up being counsel to your Plaintiffs in this class that is putative which stated investment fraudulence and securities violations. It absolutely was discontinued after settlement using the Defendants.
Tschritter v. Instaloans Financial possibilities Centres description McLennan Ross ended up being counsel towards the Defendants in this class action brought against a payday financial institution when you look at the Province of Alberta, that has been settled within the general settlement for the Ontario and Alberta course procedures against our consumers (see Bruley and Downey above).
Western Canada Buying Centres v. Dutton McLennan Ross acted for example associated with the defendants in this class that is longstanding for several years.
1023926 Alberta Ltd. v. Bank of America et al Class actions are filed against Visa, MasterCard, and a wide range of finance institutions in British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec and Ontario, claiming losings on the part of Canadian merchants who accepted re payment for items or solutions by means of Visa or MasterCard bank cards linked to solution costs and limitations on company techniques which were needed to be able to accept payments that are such. McLennan Ross will act as Alberta representative for counsel for starters of this Defendant banking institutions. The issues are at the mercy of coordinated instance administration and tend to be ongoing.
Alexander and Barrett v. HMS Financial et al McLennan Ross is co-counsel for the Plaintiffs pertaining to a nationwide and class that is cross-border alleging securities fraudulence. this course of action ended up being certified as against many specific and business Defendants, including major institutions that are financial. We’ve restored a few million bucks when it comes to course users.
Bird v. Blott & Associates et al McLennan Ross is representing among the Defendants in this class that is proposed on the behalf of a range domestic college claimants. We’ve simply filed a declaration of Defence plus the action hasn’t yet been certified.
Covidien LLC McLennan Ross is representing Covidien LLC in 2 course actions brought by people who had mesh that is urinary. Covidien is just one supplier (amongst many named manufacturers and suppliers) with this item in Canada. The litigation mirrors comparable class actions brought in the us.
L’Hirondelle v Medicentres An $11 million class action lawsuit happens to be filed more than a lacking laptop containing individual and wellness information of 620,000 Albertans. The lawsuit alleges Medicentres didn’t protect information that is private had been negligent in using a lot more than four months to see the general public in regards to the privacy breach. McLennan Ross is counsel towards the IT consulting firm, whom employed the IT consultant whom owned the laptop that is missing.
Phillips and Wournell v. Image (Topco) companies Limited et al This proposed class proceeding in British Columbia, associated with the Tracy action below, is brought against people and entities alleging conveyance that is fraudulent of associated with the ongoing Tracy payday advances course proceeding. Defence of the action is ongoing.
Poseidon Concepts Corp. McLennan Ross is lead counsel towards the auditors of Poseidon Concepts Corp. (Poseidon) in a shareholder course action claim in Alberta for $650 million, along with relevant actions filed in Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, and nyc. The events active in the different disputes, besides the Plaintiff investors, consist of: Poseidon through its Monitor, Underwriters, a Lending Syndicate of chartered banking institutions, a predecessor general public firm, as well as the directors and officers of Poseidon.
Tracy v. Instaloans Financial Solution Centres McLennan Ross is counsel towards the Defendants in class action procedures within the Province of British Columbia. The course action alleges that the Defendant payday loan providers had been operated unlawfully and claims damages within the tens of huge amount of money. Defence associated with proceeding continues subsequent to its official official official certification as a course action.